📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #PUBLIC Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Join Gate Launchpool Round 297 — PublicAI (PUBLIC) and share your post on Gate Square for a chance to win from a 4,000 $PUBLIC prize pool
🎨 Event Period
Aug 18, 2025, 10:00 – Aug 22, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate
Post original content on Gate Square related to PublicAI (PUBLIC) or the ongoing Launchpool event
Content must be at least 100 words (analysis, tutorials, creative graphics, reviews, etc.)
Add hashtag: #PUBLIC Creative Contest#
Include screenshots of your Launchpool participation (e.g., staking record, reward
Many bloggers have reported the same phenomenon.
Was simultaneously removed from several rankings by @KaitoAI
I thought about it carefully, and there are probably a few reasons.
Since my main account was put in the small black room, I haven't posted anything.
So my viewpoint is relatively objective:
1️⃣Loyalty to the project
Simultaneously promoting several or even a dozen projects and having them all on the leaderboard may be deemed disloyal by the new algorithm. There have long been rumors that @Punk9277 will use loyalty to projects as a weight for evaluation, and also as a basis for projects to be on the leaderboard. If influential figures in the ICT space or accounts with high weight also promote multiple projects at the same time, it can be very unfriendly to users with less influence and will reduce these users' enthusiasm, which is unhealthy for the project's ecosystem itself!
Frequent interaction with the same account
The peers for mutual evaluation are highly uniform, with the same people coming and going, which could be judged by the algorithm as fraudulent behavior or intentional data manipulation!
3️⃣ A large number of highly similar AI articles
The similarity of the tweets is too high, basically all are AI-generated texts. The articles lack their own subjective consciousness, merely presenting content in a mechanical manner, with no viewpoints to speak of!
Personal opinion, please don't spray if you don't like it!