Token market transparency crisis: How to break through and rebuild trust and value

The Transparency Crisis in the Encryption Industry and the Path to Bail-in

The cryptocurrency industry has gone through more than a decade of development and is at a critical turning point. While some crypto companies are beginning to move towards IPOs, the token market still faces significant issues: a lack of transparency. This severely hinders the development of the industry.

Many liquidity token investors are concerned that the token market is becoming a "lemon market." Due to a lack of effective mechanisms to distinguish between high-quality and low-quality projects, the market may ultimately be left with only low-quality projects. Token market investors face many issues that equity investors do not have to worry about, such as insufficient legal protection, multi-token issues, parasitic equity issues, founder misconduct, and foundation abuse.

These structural issues have led to a risk premium of up to 20% for tokens, significantly higher than the 5% for stocks. According to capital market pricing logic, this high premium results in token valuations being discounted by about 80%. With such a large valuation discrepancy, outstanding founders may choose to issue equity instead of tokens, creating a vicious cycle.

Industry experts believe that the core structural issue in the current token market is the ambiguous relationship between equity and tokens. The majority of the profits from many projects flow to equity holders, while the value of the tokens themselves tends to approach zero. Token holders are unclear about their own rights and do not know the rights of equity holders, leading to potential conflicts of interest.

The "everything bubble" period from 2020 to 2021 exacerbated the problems. At that time, token prices rose without fundamental support, and the industry learned the wrong lessons from it. After the bubble burst, market participants have been waiting for the next "big cycle," only now beginning to confront substantial issues such as revenue and fundamentals.

encryption companies IPO frenzy exposes the chaos in the crypto world: if we don't bail-in, everyone will run to the stock market next door

Positive changes are taking place in response to these issues. For example, emerging legal frameworks such as DUNAs and BORGs are designed to address the needs of off-chain entities engaging in commercial activities. On the regulatory front, a member of the US SEC has proposed the "safe harbor 2.0" initiative, providing a grace period for projects transitioning from centralized to decentralized.

However, the chaos in the industry remains widespread. Some projects separate the IP from the tokens, leaving the cash flow entirely to the core team. Other projects are exploring the issuance of new tokens for new business lines, raising concerns among investors. Certain teams excessively cash out in advance, leading to project failures, or pay high "consulting fees" to the core team through foundations.

To address the serious issue of insufficient information disclosure, industry experts have introduced a token transparency framework, which is an open and standardized self-disclosure template. This framework requires project parties to answer about 20 questions, covering content such as business description, supply timeline, etc., and provide supporting materials. The scoring mechanism assigns different weights based on the importance of the questions, ultimately generating a simple and understandable grade.

It is expected that this framework will have a significant impact on the token market. Projects that participate and receive reasonable ratings may see their tokens gain a premium due to increased transparency. This will attract more liquidity token funds, driving institutional capital inflow. In the short term, projects with good fundamentals that are overlooked by the market will become the main beneficiaries.

On the contrary, projects that view tokens as arbitrage tools, lack real products, or abuse market structures will be marginalized due to a lack of transparency. The emergence of a framework is expected to end the overvaluation of "fraudulent tokens," allowing resources to flow more effectively to projects that truly have product-market fit.

The chaos in the crypto circle exposed by the IPO boom of encryption companies: If we don't bail-in, everyone will run to the stock market next door

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip
· 1h ago
It's been smoothed out, who can handle it?
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployervip
· 07-10 02:16
Another transparency crisis, when will it end?
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmilingvip
· 07-10 02:14
Just pump the valuation to get the money and run away.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 07-10 02:13
Can such transparency lead to long-term development? You're overthinking it.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 07-10 02:09
Today is another great day to lose money~
View OriginalReply0
LostBetweenChainsvip
· 07-10 02:06
One sentence does not believe in so-called transparency.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 07-10 01:54
Without transparency, it's all mixed up with fish and dragons hhh
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)