Celestia proposes to reform the Consensus Mechanism, and the team's large-scale trap cashing raises controversy.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Celestia's PoG proposal and team trap cashing controversy

The Celestia network has recently fallen into a community opinion crisis. Against the backdrop of the continued decline in TIA token prices and the gradual marginalization of the project narrative, the network's revenue is sluggish, and the feasibility of the data availability track is also facing doubts. It is under these circumstances that the co-founder of Celestia proposed a disruptive governance proposal.

The founder proposed that the network should completely abandon the current proof-of-stake mechanism and instead adopt a "governance proof" model. This proposal sparked heated discussions in the crypto community as soon as it was put forward, directly addressing the core concept of blockchain governance structure.

If the proposal is approved, the Celestia network will undergo a series of significant changes: first, the issuance of TIA tokens will be drastically reduced by about 20 times, and the inflation rate will be lowered by 95%. Second, the existing delegated staking and liquidity staking contracts will be completely abolished, and the on-chain governance mechanism will also be terminated.

The newly issued TIA will be entirely used to reward validators running nodes. The election of validators will no longer rely on token voting, but will be determined through an off-chain governance mechanism. In addition, Celestia will adopt a fee-burning mechanism, where approximately $100-300 of protocol revenue will be directly used to support the value of TIA.

This proposal is essentially aimed at alleviating the inflationary pressure of the TIA price's long-term decline by constructing a more scarce and compact token economic model, injecting fundamental logic for the network's long-term value.

Staking Revolution or Exit Cover? Celestia's PoG Proposal and Billion Trap Cashing Doubts

However, just as this governance proposal aimed at "rebuilding the token economic foundation" has yet to be implemented, the community has seen a series of reports regarding the Celestia team's large-scale cashing out, leading to divergent interpretations of the proposal's original intent. On one hand, the project party emphasizes that the new model is expected to curb inflation and repair the token model; on the other hand, on-chain data shows that several core team members quickly completed large cash-outs after the unlocking window opened, with a cumulative cash-out exceeding 100 million dollars, raising market skepticism.

Some community users have accused the Celestia core team of serious opacity in multiple areas such as token unlocking, fund operations, and market promotion. According to their disclosure, Celestia executives completed the unlocking of TIA tokens as early as the beginning of October last year, and subsequently, several core figures successively realized large cash outs through over-the-counter transactions or resource swaps.

In addition, the user mentioned that Celestia had paid a large sum of money to a certain organization in exchange for its "separation" from competitors, and had paid journalists to maintain a positive image of the project. This series of financial operations has been accused of being a typical operation of "paid promotion."

Staking Revolution or Exit Cover? Celestia's PoG Proposal and the Billion Trap Doubt

An internal team token distribution and monetization data sheet provided by a crypto KOL shows that team members have sold a total of approximately 9.43 million TIA, with an estimated cumulative cash amount reaching as high as 109 million USD at the then market price. The largest sell-off address has sold over 2.6 million TIA, corresponding to approximately 27.37 million USD.

Staking Revolution or Cashing Out Cover? Celestia's PoG Proposal and Billion Trap Suspicion

Although Celestia's current valuation is marked by outsiders at 3.5 billion dollars, its actual revenue is far from supporting such inflated valuation. Public data shows that Celestia's average daily protocol revenue is less than a hundred dollars, with an annualized potential of around 5 million dollars. Industry insiders generally believe that Celestia's market pricing is more like a premium advance for "future narratives" rather than being based on existing usage data or business models.

In the face of various accusations and public opinion turmoil, the founder of Celestia publicly stated that all core members are still on duty and revealed that they currently have over $100 million in capital reserves, which can support operations for more than 6 years. He believes that in this industry, almost all tokens will experience a 95% crash at some point, which is the norm rather than the exception. Currently, TIA has fallen 92% from its peak.

Staking Revolution or Exit Cover? Celestia's PoG Proposal and the 100 Million Trap Cloud

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZkProofPuddingvip
· 7h ago
The door is closed, what’s there to manage? I'm outta here.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 19h ago
Rug Pull scheduled gm
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 19h ago
play people for suckers and then提改革 classic operation
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 19h ago
Classic pump and dump
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologistvip
· 19h ago
trap cash out with master nb
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 19h ago
Govern inflation, funds first run, typical script.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodievip
· 19h ago
another rug recipe brewing... tastes like rotten governance soup
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)